The independent media outlet Novara Media has come under attack by a mainstream journalist challenging its business model. But Novara hit back, as did others, mounting a defence of its work on Twitter.
The attacker
The attack came from Buzzfeed and Guardian contributor, James Ball. Ball is best known for turning his back on the whistleblowing media organisation WikiLeaks. And he’s known, more recently, for showing support for the payday lending service, Wonga.
Ball took issue with Novara’s new fundraising model, tweeting that:
https://twitter.com/jamesrbuk/status/1066272215715459072
He added that his criticism wasn’t personally aimed at Ash Sarkar, the senior editor of Novara, who posted the tweet he responded to:
https://twitter.com/jamesrbuk/status/1066272580481556480
But this didn’t go unnoticed by Sarkar herself, who responded:
Not aimed at James, but I’m so sick of the old establishment centre. It’s full of Oxbridge white men telling a diverse team of working class people not to try doing something new unless you’ve got big capital backing you. https://t.co/6TMqnaTFrA
— Ash Sarkar (@AyoCaesar) November 24, 2018
A terrible argument
Ball’s criticism that voluntary journalism harms other professional journalists’ wages was challenged.
Novara co-founder Aaron Bastani claimed there’s a glaring hole in Ball’s argument. He argued that if independent media operated to Ball’s liking (in terms of wages), it would be funded by business or private wealth:
According to @jamesrbuk the only legitimate way to start a new media organisation would therefore be venture capital or a wealthy donor?
I'm incredibly proud of what we've done at @novaramedia – and how we've done it. A lot of these people wouldn't even know where to start. https://t.co/x7fNJVACUn
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) November 24, 2018
Journalist Abi Wilkinson also challenged Ball directly on this point:
https://twitter.com/AbiWilks/status/1066381229556142081
Wilkinson added that:
https://twitter.com/AbiWilks/status/1066465797135044608
Writer Richard Seymour also responded:
If socialists didn't organise, meet, write, etc., on a volunteer basis, most of it wouldn't happen. Anyone who has ever done anything outside of establishment politics would know this. This is moronic liberal concern trolling in a flimsy guise of 'class politics'. https://t.co/zvajEYn87A
— Richard Seymour (@leninology) November 24, 2018
Ball getting his facts wrong?
Ball then changed tack. He shifting from debating the ethics of voluntary journalism and instead questioned Novara‘s legal standing, claiming it’s a company with shareholders:
https://twitter.com/jamesrbuk/status/1066295945313337344
But the Novara team quickly showed this to be incorrect:
Putting those famed investigative skills to work are we, Jimmy? I'd stick to annotating pop songs if I were you. pic.twitter.com/xoniQDkBml
— James B (@piercepenniless) November 24, 2018
Ball kept doling out the criticism though, which Novara continued to call out:
What precisely did you 'call us out' on that was actually true? And why are you now insinuating something else? That's rather low don't you think?
Is this method-acting post-truth or bluffocracy? You appear to have both down to a t. https://t.co/ZOpc6t3ULT
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) November 25, 2018
Jealously, fear, or a smear campaign?
These kind of attacks on independent media outlets by mainstream media figures tell a story. Independent media is gaining influence and holding the powerful, including the mainstream media, to account. This appears to be creating resentment with media gatekeepers.
But rather than spending time and energy attacking independent media outlets, the media should be challenging the powerful. That is, after all, what journalism is meant to be: holding power to account.
