Senior Tory says Boris Johnson’s rhetoric has led directly to death threats

by The Canary

17 August 2019

in UK

Reading Time: 4 mins read

A Tory former attorney general has accused Boris Johnson of “behaving like a demagogue” and said the Prime Minister’s rhetoric has led directly to him receiving death threats.

Remain-supporter Dominic Grieve insisted he wanted to stay in the Conservative Party to “save” it from the likes of Mr Johnson – who he claimed was “hijacking” it.

The Beaconsfield MP lambasted the PM’s “tub-thumping populism”, which he said had led “straightforwardly” to the death threats he has received.

Mr Grieve, who said someone was arrested in respect of a death threat against him recently, told the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme: “I want to save the Tory Party from the likes of Mr Johnson – he’s hijacking it and taking it in directions which I find extremely worrying.

On receiving death threats, Grieve says: “I would expect a Conservative Prime Minister to absolutely denounce this and also to make sure that in his own rhetoric and language he avoids anything which can encourage it and it is quite plain that he’s not doing so.”

— BBCScot WeekendGMS (@BBCWeekendGMS) August 17, 2019

“I don’t like the rhetoric, after all, the rhetoric leads straightforwardly to the death threats which I receive.

“And this seems to me that the language he’s using is not that of what I would expect of a Conservative Prime Minister.

“We have a deeply divided country – I think we have to accept that – and we are not going to resolve this problem by the sort of tub-thumping populism which he’s trying to espouse.

“He’s behaving like a demagogue, but I don’t think we should be surprised about that given his track record.”

Mr Grieve said if leading politicians use “emotive language” such as “collaborator” or calling people “traitors”, MPs “immediately start to receive really vile emails and communications from members of the public, and some of them contain death threats”.

He added: “All of us who have been trying to stand up for our principles and for our country are recipients of this.

“It’s been going on for a long time but I would expect a Conservative Prime Minister to absolutely denounce this and also to make sure that in his own rhetoric and language he avoids anything which can encourage it.

“And it’s quite plain that he’s not doing so. I’m not surprised at that in view of my own assessment of him.”

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has insisted he will take Britain out of the EU on October 31 with or without a deal (Dominic Lipinski/PA)

Earlier this week, Mr Johnson accused MPs and the EU of collaborating to block Brexit, which he has vowed to deliver with or without a deal on October 31.

Mr Grieve also said he would be willing to bring down Mr Johnson’s administration if he pursued a no-deal Brexit, and that he would be happy to cooperate with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.

“I am very happy to cooperate with any parliamentary colleagues – including Jeremy Corbyn – in trying to prevent a no-deal Brexit and I think that there is quite a considerable head of steam growing up to try to make sure that no-deal doesn’t occur,” he explained.

“It may be that in order to do that it is necessary – and I’ve said I’d be willing to do it, although I don’t want to do it – to bring down Boris Johnson’s administration.

Tags: Brexit

Comments 1

Smythe-Mogg says:

7 years ago

Upon reading the headline I assumed it was death threats against Johnson under discussion; a reasonable supposition.

The article mentions threats of various kinds frequently are made against individual politicians. Obviously, most of these are of no consequence and politicians shrug them off as par for the course.

That said, it is disturbing to hear of threats against opponents of ‘no deal’ Brexit. Equally disconcerting would be reports of threats against Johnson and his chums, despite their hubris.

Brexit is the most divisive issue faced by the UK population in living memory. It could easily lead to civil unrest. Thus it is not surprising to hear of disgruntled people who feel powerless to alter matters resort to threats of violence; such people are unlikely to be drawn from the chattering class used to more or less civil discussion around the dinner table.

Threats may be disconnected. Yet possibility remains of planned campaigns by people drawn from opposing views.

Whilst deplorable that nevertheless is how life pans out in divided societies. As matters stand, there is too much uncertainty over what course of action a substantial majority of the population would either support or reluctantly go along with.

Brexit, ‘no deal’ or otherwise, is not a matter of great urgency justifying precipitate action with attendant risks of violent discord. Wise leadership, that capable of detaching itself from considerations of personal self-interest, would defuse avoidable tension by allowing breathing space for further consideration. Means include seeking extension of the arbitrary deadline so that Parliament may properly come to a decision. Is Johnson up to what used to be called statesmanship?